Hi !
i have a SQL 2000 A/P cluster with 4 CPU ancd 8 GByte with AWE enabled; my
db as work fine but from same day a error was dispaly in my application log
:
Event Type: Error
Event Source: MSSQLSERVER
Event Category: (2)
Event ID: 17052
Date: 28/07/2006
Time: 9.32.02
User: N/A
Computer: CLSSQL2000
Description:
Error: 1204, Severity: 19, State: 1
The SQL Server cannot obtain a LOCK resource at this time. Rerun your
statement when there are fewer active users or ask the system administrator
to check the SQL Server lock and memory configuration
I have check for memory free with taskmanager and there is 2 Gb yte frre (i
have awe with 6 Gbyte configured) and with spconfigure but the awe and
memory configuration seems ok.
But why this error occurred ? What happened ?
Thanks in advance!is there any long running store procedure / query running on that server
with following statement.
Select *... INTO <table1> FROM ...
When queries like that runs, it applies exclusive lock on the system tables.
you would get "SQL Server cannot obtain a LOCK resource at this time" error
on the database until the above sp/query is completed. you may get the same
error when you try to list the table in enterprise manager.
change the code by creating the table first and do the insert into, instead
of Select ... into ...
Create <table> ( field1...,
field2...)
Insert into <table> SELECT ... FROM ...
-Saravanan
<io.com@.newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message
news:ezy5pGWxGHA.5056@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Hi !
> i have a SQL 2000 A/P cluster with 4 CPU ancd 8 GByte with AWE enabled; my
> db as work fine but from same day a error was dispaly in my application
> log :
> Event Type: Error
> Event Source: MSSQLSERVER
> Event Category: (2)
> Event ID: 17052
> Date: 28/07/2006
> Time: 9.32.02
> User: N/A
> Computer: CLSSQL2000
> Description:
> Error: 1204, Severity: 19, State: 1
> The SQL Server cannot obtain a LOCK resource at this time. Rerun your
> statement when there are fewer active users or ask the system
> administrator to check the SQL Server lock and memory configuration
>
> I have check for memory free with taskmanager and there is 2 Gb yte frre
> (i have awe with 6 Gbyte configured) and with spconfigure but the awe and
> memory configuration seems ok.
> But why this error occurred ? What happened ?
> Thanks in advance!
>|||Hi,
Thanks Saravanan for greate suggestion. You can also refer to following
article:
323630 How to resolve blocking problems that are caused by lock escalation
in SQL Server
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;323630
Thanks.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
======================================================
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
======================================================This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
======================================================>>From: <io.com@.newsgroup.nospam>
>>Subject: About sqlserver2000 error in application log
>>Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:37:42 +0200
>>Lines: 30
>>X-Priority: 3
>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
>>X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
>>Message-ID: <ezy5pGWxGHA.5056@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>
>>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>>NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.241.4.149
>>Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl
>>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.server:442635
>>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>>Hi !
>>i have a SQL 2000 A/P cluster with 4 CPU ancd 8 GByte with AWE enabled;
my
>>db as work fine but from same day a error was dispaly in my application
log
>>:
>>Event Type: Error
>>Event Source: MSSQLSERVER
>>Event Category: (2)
>>Event ID: 17052
>>Date: 28/07/2006
>>Time: 9.32.02
>>User: N/A
>>Computer: CLSSQL2000
>>Description:
>>Error: 1204, Severity: 19, State: 1
>>The SQL Server cannot obtain a LOCK resource at this time. Rerun your
>>statement when there are fewer active users or ask the system
administrator
>>to check the SQL Server lock and memory configuration
>>
>>I have check for memory free with taskmanager and there is 2 Gb yte frre
(i
>>have awe with 6 Gbyte configured) and with spconfigure but the awe and
>>memory configuration seems ok.
>>But why this error occurred ? What happened ?
>>Thanks in advance!
>>
Showing posts with label gbyte. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gbyte. Show all posts
Saturday, February 25, 2012
About sqlserver2000 error in application log
Hi !
i have a SQL 2000 A/P cluster with 4 CPU ancd 8 GByte with AWE enabled; my
db as work fine but from same day a error was dispaly in my application log
:
Event Type: Error
Event Source: MSSQLSERVER
Event Category: (2)
Event ID: 17052
Date: 28/07/2006
Time: 9.32.02
User: N/A
Computer: CLSSQL2000
Description:
Error: 1204, Severity: 19, State: 1
The SQL Server cannot obtain a LOCK resource at this time. Rerun your
statement when there are fewer active users or ask the system administrator
to check the SQL Server lock and memory configuration
I have check for memory free with taskmanager and there is 2 Gb yte frre (i
have awe with 6 Gbyte configured) and with spconfigure but the awe and
memory configuration seems ok.
But why this error occurred ? What happened ?
Thanks in advance!is there any long running store procedure / query running on that server
with following statement.
Select *... INTO <table1> FROM ...
When queries like that runs, it applies exclusive lock on the system tables.
you would get "SQL Server cannot obtain a LOCK resource at this time" error
on the database until the above sp/query is completed. you may get the same
error when you try to list the table in enterprise manager.
change the code by creating the table first and do the insert into, instead
of Select ... into ...
Create <table> ( field1...,
field2...)
Insert into <table> SELECT ... FROM ...
-Saravanan
<io.com@.newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message
news:ezy5pGWxGHA.5056@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Hi !
> i have a SQL 2000 A/P cluster with 4 CPU ancd 8 GByte with AWE enabled; my
> db as work fine but from same day a error was dispaly in my application
> log :
> Event Type: Error
> Event Source: MSSQLSERVER
> Event Category: (2)
> Event ID: 17052
> Date: 28/07/2006
> Time: 9.32.02
> User: N/A
> Computer: CLSSQL2000
> Description:
> Error: 1204, Severity: 19, State: 1
> The SQL Server cannot obtain a LOCK resource at this time. Rerun your
> statement when there are fewer active users or ask the system
> administrator to check the SQL Server lock and memory configuration
>
> I have check for memory free with taskmanager and there is 2 Gb yte frre
> (i have awe with 6 Gbyte configured) and with spconfigure but the awe and
> memory configuration seems ok.
> But why this error occurred ? What happened ?
> Thanks in advance!
>|||Hi,
Thanks Saravanan for greate suggestion. You can also refer to following
article:
323630 How to resolve blocking problems that are caused by lock escalation
in SQL Server
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;EN-US;323630
Thanks.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
========================================
==============
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
========================================
==============
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
========================================
==============
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
========================================
==============
--[vbcol=seagreen]
my[vbcol=seagreen]
log[vbcol=seagreen]
administrator[vbcol=seagreen]
(i[vbcol=seagreen]
i have a SQL 2000 A/P cluster with 4 CPU ancd 8 GByte with AWE enabled; my
db as work fine but from same day a error was dispaly in my application log
:
Event Type: Error
Event Source: MSSQLSERVER
Event Category: (2)
Event ID: 17052
Date: 28/07/2006
Time: 9.32.02
User: N/A
Computer: CLSSQL2000
Description:
Error: 1204, Severity: 19, State: 1
The SQL Server cannot obtain a LOCK resource at this time. Rerun your
statement when there are fewer active users or ask the system administrator
to check the SQL Server lock and memory configuration
I have check for memory free with taskmanager and there is 2 Gb yte frre (i
have awe with 6 Gbyte configured) and with spconfigure but the awe and
memory configuration seems ok.
But why this error occurred ? What happened ?
Thanks in advance!is there any long running store procedure / query running on that server
with following statement.
Select *... INTO <table1> FROM ...
When queries like that runs, it applies exclusive lock on the system tables.
you would get "SQL Server cannot obtain a LOCK resource at this time" error
on the database until the above sp/query is completed. you may get the same
error when you try to list the table in enterprise manager.
change the code by creating the table first and do the insert into, instead
of Select ... into ...
Create <table> ( field1...,
field2...)
Insert into <table> SELECT ... FROM ...
-Saravanan
<io.com@.newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message
news:ezy5pGWxGHA.5056@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Hi !
> i have a SQL 2000 A/P cluster with 4 CPU ancd 8 GByte with AWE enabled; my
> db as work fine but from same day a error was dispaly in my application
> log :
> Event Type: Error
> Event Source: MSSQLSERVER
> Event Category: (2)
> Event ID: 17052
> Date: 28/07/2006
> Time: 9.32.02
> User: N/A
> Computer: CLSSQL2000
> Description:
> Error: 1204, Severity: 19, State: 1
> The SQL Server cannot obtain a LOCK resource at this time. Rerun your
> statement when there are fewer active users or ask the system
> administrator to check the SQL Server lock and memory configuration
>
> I have check for memory free with taskmanager and there is 2 Gb yte frre
> (i have awe with 6 Gbyte configured) and with spconfigure but the awe and
> memory configuration seems ok.
> But why this error occurred ? What happened ?
> Thanks in advance!
>|||Hi,
Thanks Saravanan for greate suggestion. You can also refer to following
article:
323630 How to resolve blocking problems that are caused by lock escalation
in SQL Server
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;EN-US;323630
Thanks.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
========================================
==============
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
========================================
==============
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
========================================
==============
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
========================================
==============
--[vbcol=seagreen]
my[vbcol=seagreen]
log[vbcol=seagreen]
administrator[vbcol=seagreen]
(i[vbcol=seagreen]
About SQL2000 Performance
Hi all,
i have a database SQL 2000 with size 5.6 Gbyte and more table and index on
my server 2 PIII 700 with 2 Gbyte of RAM.
Nearly always i see (with task manager) that sqlserver.exe working with 1.9
Gbyte di RAM and the connection to my db is more slow (some time time out!)
My web server that make the connect to my SQL Server do not have any problem
to work.
I try to trace some counters with performance monitor and view this value
(average) on my server DB :
% Processor Time 12.334
Active Transactions 17.011
User connections 60.111
Number of deadlock/sec 0
Aviable MByte 16.770
Totale Server Memory 1933424
The question is :
How i determine the proportions dor the RAM of my server to working my db
SQL optimal ?!?
For the RAM the actual memory (2 Gbyte) is sufficient ?
Thanks in advance
--
--Do you have any other apps that SQL Server running on this server? What is
your cache hit ratio? If it is at about 98% or higher you may want to set
your max memory setting in SQL Server to about 1.5GB and see if that helps
some. SQL Server will still use about 1.75GB but that will leave some
memory dedicated for the other apps and the OS without SQL Server having to
dynamically manage it and swap back and forth.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
<io.com> wrote in message news:O7eCrC3gEHA.216@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi all,
> i have a database SQL 2000 with size 5.6 Gbyte and more table and index
on
> my server 2 PIII 700 with 2 Gbyte of RAM.
> Nearly always i see (with task manager) that sqlserver.exe working with
1.9
> Gbyte di RAM and the connection to my db is more slow (some time time
out!)
> My web server that make the connect to my SQL Server do not have any
problem
> to work.
> I try to trace some counters with performance monitor and view this value
> (average) on my server DB :
> % Processor Time 12.334
> Active Transactions 17.011
> User connections 60.111
> Number of deadlock/sec 0
> Aviable MByte 16.770
> Totale Server Memory 1933424
> The question is :
> How i determine the proportions dor the RAM of my server to working my db
> SQL optimal ?!?
> For the RAM the actual memory (2 Gbyte) is sufficient ?
> Thanks in advance
> --
> --
>
i have a database SQL 2000 with size 5.6 Gbyte and more table and index on
my server 2 PIII 700 with 2 Gbyte of RAM.
Nearly always i see (with task manager) that sqlserver.exe working with 1.9
Gbyte di RAM and the connection to my db is more slow (some time time out!)
My web server that make the connect to my SQL Server do not have any problem
to work.
I try to trace some counters with performance monitor and view this value
(average) on my server DB :
% Processor Time 12.334
Active Transactions 17.011
User connections 60.111
Number of deadlock/sec 0
Aviable MByte 16.770
Totale Server Memory 1933424
The question is :
How i determine the proportions dor the RAM of my server to working my db
SQL optimal ?!?
For the RAM the actual memory (2 Gbyte) is sufficient ?
Thanks in advance
--
--Do you have any other apps that SQL Server running on this server? What is
your cache hit ratio? If it is at about 98% or higher you may want to set
your max memory setting in SQL Server to about 1.5GB and see if that helps
some. SQL Server will still use about 1.75GB but that will leave some
memory dedicated for the other apps and the OS without SQL Server having to
dynamically manage it and swap back and forth.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
<io.com> wrote in message news:O7eCrC3gEHA.216@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi all,
> i have a database SQL 2000 with size 5.6 Gbyte and more table and index
on
> my server 2 PIII 700 with 2 Gbyte of RAM.
> Nearly always i see (with task manager) that sqlserver.exe working with
1.9
> Gbyte di RAM and the connection to my db is more slow (some time time
out!)
> My web server that make the connect to my SQL Server do not have any
problem
> to work.
> I try to trace some counters with performance monitor and view this value
> (average) on my server DB :
> % Processor Time 12.334
> Active Transactions 17.011
> User connections 60.111
> Number of deadlock/sec 0
> Aviable MByte 16.770
> Totale Server Memory 1933424
> The question is :
> How i determine the proportions dor the RAM of my server to working my db
> SQL optimal ?!?
> For the RAM the actual memory (2 Gbyte) is sufficient ?
> Thanks in advance
> --
> --
>
About SQL2000 Performance
Hi all,
i have a database SQL 2000 with size 5.6 Gbyte and more table and index on
my server 2 PIII 700 with 2 Gbyte of RAM.
Nearly always i see (with task manager) that sqlserver.exe working with 1.9
Gbyte di RAM and the connection to my db is more slow (some time time out!)
My web server that make the connect to my SQL Server do not have any problem
to work.
I try to trace some counters with performance monitor and view this value
(average) on my server DB :
% Processor Time 12.334
Active Transactions 17.011
User connections 60.111
Number of deadlock/sec 0
Aviable MByte 16.770
Totale Server Memory 1933424
The question is :
How i determine the proportions dor the RAM of my server to working my db
SQL optimal ?!?
For the RAM the actual memory (2 Gbyte) is sufficient ?
Thanks in advance
--
Do you have any other apps that SQL Server running on this server? What is
your cache hit ratio? If it is at about 98% or higher you may want to set
your max memory setting in SQL Server to about 1.5GB and see if that helps
some. SQL Server will still use about 1.75GB but that will leave some
memory dedicated for the other apps and the OS without SQL Server having to
dynamically manage it and swap back and forth.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
<io.com> wrote in message news:O7eCrC3gEHA.216@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi all,
> i have a database SQL 2000 with size 5.6 Gbyte and more table and index
on
> my server 2 PIII 700 with 2 Gbyte of RAM.
> Nearly always i see (with task manager) that sqlserver.exe working with
1.9
> Gbyte di RAM and the connection to my db is more slow (some time time
out!)
> My web server that make the connect to my SQL Server do not have any
problem
> to work.
> I try to trace some counters with performance monitor and view this value
> (average) on my server DB :
> % Processor Time 12.334
> Active Transactions 17.011
> User connections 60.111
> Number of deadlock/sec 0
> Aviable MByte 16.770
> Totale Server Memory 1933424
> The question is :
> How i determine the proportions dor the RAM of my server to working my db
> SQL optimal ?!?
> For the RAM the actual memory (2 Gbyte) is sufficient ?
> Thanks in advance
> --
> --
>
i have a database SQL 2000 with size 5.6 Gbyte and more table and index on
my server 2 PIII 700 with 2 Gbyte of RAM.
Nearly always i see (with task manager) that sqlserver.exe working with 1.9
Gbyte di RAM and the connection to my db is more slow (some time time out!)
My web server that make the connect to my SQL Server do not have any problem
to work.
I try to trace some counters with performance monitor and view this value
(average) on my server DB :
% Processor Time 12.334
Active Transactions 17.011
User connections 60.111
Number of deadlock/sec 0
Aviable MByte 16.770
Totale Server Memory 1933424
The question is :
How i determine the proportions dor the RAM of my server to working my db
SQL optimal ?!?
For the RAM the actual memory (2 Gbyte) is sufficient ?
Thanks in advance
--
Do you have any other apps that SQL Server running on this server? What is
your cache hit ratio? If it is at about 98% or higher you may want to set
your max memory setting in SQL Server to about 1.5GB and see if that helps
some. SQL Server will still use about 1.75GB but that will leave some
memory dedicated for the other apps and the OS without SQL Server having to
dynamically manage it and swap back and forth.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
<io.com> wrote in message news:O7eCrC3gEHA.216@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi all,
> i have a database SQL 2000 with size 5.6 Gbyte and more table and index
on
> my server 2 PIII 700 with 2 Gbyte of RAM.
> Nearly always i see (with task manager) that sqlserver.exe working with
1.9
> Gbyte di RAM and the connection to my db is more slow (some time time
out!)
> My web server that make the connect to my SQL Server do not have any
problem
> to work.
> I try to trace some counters with performance monitor and view this value
> (average) on my server DB :
> % Processor Time 12.334
> Active Transactions 17.011
> User connections 60.111
> Number of deadlock/sec 0
> Aviable MByte 16.770
> Totale Server Memory 1933424
> The question is :
> How i determine the proportions dor the RAM of my server to working my db
> SQL optimal ?!?
> For the RAM the actual memory (2 Gbyte) is sufficient ?
> Thanks in advance
> --
> --
>
About SQL2000 Performance
Hi all,
i have a database SQL 2000 with size 5.6 Gbyte and more table and index on
my server 2 PIII 700 with 2 Gbyte of RAM.
Nearly always i see (with task manager) that sqlserver.exe working with 1.9
Gbyte di RAM and the connection to my db is more slow (some time time out!)
My web server that make the connect to my SQL Server do not have any problem
to work.
I try to trace some counters with performance monitor and view this value
(average) on my server DB :
% Processor Time 12.334
Active Transactions 17.011
User connections 60.111
Number of deadlock/sec 0
Aviable MByte 16.770
Totale Server Memory 1933424
The question is :
How i determine the proportions dor the RAM of my server to working my db
SQL optimal ?!?
For the RAM the actual memory (2 Gbyte) is sufficient ?
Thanks in advance
--
--Do you have any other apps that SQL Server running on this server? What is
your cache hit ratio? If it is at about 98% or higher you may want to set
your max memory setting in SQL Server to about 1.5GB and see if that helps
some. SQL Server will still use about 1.75GB but that will leave some
memory dedicated for the other apps and the OS without SQL Server having to
dynamically manage it and swap back and forth.
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
<io.com> wrote in message news:O7eCrC3gEHA.216@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi all,
> i have a database SQL 2000 with size 5.6 Gbyte and more table and index
on
> my server 2 PIII 700 with 2 Gbyte of RAM.
> Nearly always i see (with task manager) that sqlserver.exe working with
1.9
> Gbyte di RAM and the connection to my db is more slow (some time time
out!)
> My web server that make the connect to my SQL Server do not have any
problem
> to work.
> I try to trace some counters with performance monitor and view this value
> (average) on my server DB :
> % Processor Time 12.334
> Active Transactions 17.011
> User connections 60.111
> Number of deadlock/sec 0
> Aviable MByte 16.770
> Totale Server Memory 1933424
> The question is :
> How i determine the proportions dor the RAM of my server to working my db
> SQL optimal ?!?
> For the RAM the actual memory (2 Gbyte) is sufficient ?
> Thanks in advance
> --
> --
>
i have a database SQL 2000 with size 5.6 Gbyte and more table and index on
my server 2 PIII 700 with 2 Gbyte of RAM.
Nearly always i see (with task manager) that sqlserver.exe working with 1.9
Gbyte di RAM and the connection to my db is more slow (some time time out!)
My web server that make the connect to my SQL Server do not have any problem
to work.
I try to trace some counters with performance monitor and view this value
(average) on my server DB :
% Processor Time 12.334
Active Transactions 17.011
User connections 60.111
Number of deadlock/sec 0
Aviable MByte 16.770
Totale Server Memory 1933424
The question is :
How i determine the proportions dor the RAM of my server to working my db
SQL optimal ?!?
For the RAM the actual memory (2 Gbyte) is sufficient ?
Thanks in advance
--
--Do you have any other apps that SQL Server running on this server? What is
your cache hit ratio? If it is at about 98% or higher you may want to set
your max memory setting in SQL Server to about 1.5GB and see if that helps
some. SQL Server will still use about 1.75GB but that will leave some
memory dedicated for the other apps and the OS without SQL Server having to
dynamically manage it and swap back and forth.
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
<io.com> wrote in message news:O7eCrC3gEHA.216@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi all,
> i have a database SQL 2000 with size 5.6 Gbyte and more table and index
on
> my server 2 PIII 700 with 2 Gbyte of RAM.
> Nearly always i see (with task manager) that sqlserver.exe working with
1.9
> Gbyte di RAM and the connection to my db is more slow (some time time
out!)
> My web server that make the connect to my SQL Server do not have any
problem
> to work.
> I try to trace some counters with performance monitor and view this value
> (average) on my server DB :
> % Processor Time 12.334
> Active Transactions 17.011
> User connections 60.111
> Number of deadlock/sec 0
> Aviable MByte 16.770
> Totale Server Memory 1933424
> The question is :
> How i determine the proportions dor the RAM of my server to working my db
> SQL optimal ?!?
> For the RAM the actual memory (2 Gbyte) is sufficient ?
> Thanks in advance
> --
> --
>
Thursday, February 16, 2012
About ms06-040 memory bug
Hi ,
i have read this KB but this applied also to SQL with AWE enabled for more
then 4 Gbyte ?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/924054
ThanksHi,
It is a Windows Server bug, regardless which application you launched on
the Server.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
========================================
==============
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
========================================
==============
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
========================================
==============
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
========================================
==============
--[vbcol=seagreen]
more[vbcol=seagreen]|||"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" <v-xuwen@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> It is a Windows Server bug, regardless which application you launched on
> the Server.
So is affecting also SQL Server with my configuration ?
Bye !|||Hi,
Glad to hear the information I provided is helpful.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
========================================
==============
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
========================================
==============
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
========================================
==============
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
========================================
==============
--[vbcol=seagreen]
<pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>[vbcol=seagreen]|||Thanks!
"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" <v-xuwen@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FoE0V8nxGHA.3392@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Glad to hear the information I provided is helpful.
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Vincent Xu
> Microsoft Online Partner Support
> ========================================
==============
> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> ========================================
==============
> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others
> may learn and benefit from this issue.
> ========================================
==============
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
> ========================================
==============
>
> --
> <pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
>|||Vincent,
Has anyone found a solution for this bug. We have been trying partner
support channels but keep getting tranferred to different groups over the
last two weeks and we still have customers that are having the problem. even
with the hotfix applied.
I would appreciate any help you could provide.
"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" wrote:
> Hi,
> Glad to hear the information I provided is helpful.
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Vincent Xu
> Microsoft Online Partner Support
> ========================================
==============
> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> ========================================
==============
> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others
> may learn and benefit from this issue.
> ========================================
==============
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
> ========================================
==============
>
> --
> <pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
>
i have read this KB but this applied also to SQL with AWE enabled for more
then 4 Gbyte ?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/924054
ThanksHi,
It is a Windows Server bug, regardless which application you launched on
the Server.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
========================================
==============
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
========================================
==============
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
========================================
==============
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
========================================
==============
--[vbcol=seagreen]
more[vbcol=seagreen]|||"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" <v-xuwen@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> It is a Windows Server bug, regardless which application you launched on
> the Server.
So is affecting also SQL Server with my configuration ?
Bye !|||Hi,
Glad to hear the information I provided is helpful.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
========================================
==============
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
========================================
==============
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
========================================
==============
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
========================================
==============
--[vbcol=seagreen]
<pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>[vbcol=seagreen]|||Thanks!
"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" <v-xuwen@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FoE0V8nxGHA.3392@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Glad to hear the information I provided is helpful.
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Vincent Xu
> Microsoft Online Partner Support
> ========================================
==============
> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> ========================================
==============
> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others
> may learn and benefit from this issue.
> ========================================
==============
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
> ========================================
==============
>
> --
> <pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
>|||Vincent,
Has anyone found a solution for this bug. We have been trying partner
support channels but keep getting tranferred to different groups over the
last two weeks and we still have customers that are having the problem. even
with the hotfix applied.
I would appreciate any help you could provide.
"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" wrote:
> Hi,
> Glad to hear the information I provided is helpful.
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Vincent Xu
> Microsoft Online Partner Support
> ========================================
==============
> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> ========================================
==============
> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others
> may learn and benefit from this issue.
> ========================================
==============
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
> ========================================
==============
>
> --
> <pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
>
About ms06-040 memory bug
Hi ,
i have read this KB but this applied also to SQL with AWE enabled for more
then 4 Gbyte ?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/924054
ThanksHi,
It is a Windows Server bug, regardless which application you launched on
the Server.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
======================================================
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
======================================================This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
======================================================>>From: <io.com@.newsgroup.nospam>
>>Subject: About ms06-040 memory bug
>>Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:39:25 +0200
>>Lines: 10
>>X-Priority: 3
>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
>>X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
>>Message-ID: <exuolHWxGHA.3964@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>
>>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>>NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.241.4.149
>>Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl
>>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.server:442636
>>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>>Hi ,
>>i have read this KB but this applied also to SQL with AWE enabled for
more
>>then 4 Gbyte ?
>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/924054
>>Thanks
>>|||"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" <v-xuwen@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> It is a Windows Server bug, regardless which application you launched on
> the Server.
So is affecting also SQL Server with my configuration ?
Bye !|||Hi,
Glad to hear the information I provided is helpful.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
======================================================Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
======================================================This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
======================================================>>From: <io.com@.newsgroup.nospam>
>>References: <exuolHWxGHA.3964@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>
<pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
>>Subject: Re: About ms06-040 memory bug
>>Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:09:13 +0200
>>Lines: 12
>>X-Priority: 3
>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
>>X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
>>Message-ID: <OglHDJcxGHA.1224@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>
>>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>>NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.241.4.149
>>Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl
>>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.server:442675
>>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>>"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" <v-xuwen@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>news:pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
>> Hi,
>> It is a Windows Server bug, regardless which application you launched on
>> the Server.
>>So is affecting also SQL Server with my configuration ?
>>Bye !
>>|||Thanks!
"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" <v-xuwen@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FoE0V8nxGHA.3392@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Glad to hear the information I provided is helpful.
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Vincent Xu
> Microsoft Online Partner Support
> ======================================================> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> ======================================================> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others
> may learn and benefit from this issue.
> ======================================================> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
> ======================================================>
> --
>>From: <io.com@.newsgroup.nospam>
>>References: <exuolHWxGHA.3964@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>
> <pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
>>Subject: Re: About ms06-040 memory bug
>>Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:09:13 +0200
>>Lines: 12
>>X-Priority: 3
>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
>>X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
>>Message-ID: <OglHDJcxGHA.1224@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>
>>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>>NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.241.4.149
>>Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl
>>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.server:442675
>>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>>"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" <v-xuwen@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>news:pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
>> Hi,
>> It is a Windows Server bug, regardless which application you launched
>> on
>> the Server.
>>So is affecting also SQL Server with my configuration ?
>>Bye !
>>
>|||Vincent,
Has anyone found a solution for this bug. We have been trying partner
support channels but keep getting tranferred to different groups over the
last two weeks and we still have customers that are having the problem. even
with the hotfix applied.
I would appreciate any help you could provide.
"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" wrote:
> Hi,
> Glad to hear the information I provided is helpful.
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Vincent Xu
> Microsoft Online Partner Support
> ======================================================> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> ======================================================> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others
> may learn and benefit from this issue.
> ======================================================> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
> ======================================================>
> --
> >>From: <io.com@.newsgroup.nospam>
> >>References: <exuolHWxGHA.3964@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>
> <pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
> >>Subject: Re: About ms06-040 memory bug
> >>Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:09:13 +0200
> >>Lines: 12
> >>X-Priority: 3
> >>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
> >>X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
> >>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
> >>Message-ID: <OglHDJcxGHA.1224@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>
> >>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
> >>NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.241.4.149
> >>Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl
> >>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.server:442675
> >>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
> >>
> >>"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" <v-xuwen@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >>news:pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> It is a Windows Server bug, regardless which application you launched on
> >> the Server.
> >>
> >>So is affecting also SQL Server with my configuration ?
> >>
> >>Bye !
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
i have read this KB but this applied also to SQL with AWE enabled for more
then 4 Gbyte ?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/924054
ThanksHi,
It is a Windows Server bug, regardless which application you launched on
the Server.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
======================================================
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
======================================================This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
======================================================>>From: <io.com@.newsgroup.nospam>
>>Subject: About ms06-040 memory bug
>>Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:39:25 +0200
>>Lines: 10
>>X-Priority: 3
>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
>>X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
>>Message-ID: <exuolHWxGHA.3964@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>
>>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>>NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.241.4.149
>>Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl
>>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.server:442636
>>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>>Hi ,
>>i have read this KB but this applied also to SQL with AWE enabled for
more
>>then 4 Gbyte ?
>>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/924054
>>Thanks
>>|||"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" <v-xuwen@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> It is a Windows Server bug, regardless which application you launched on
> the Server.
So is affecting also SQL Server with my configuration ?
Bye !|||Hi,
Glad to hear the information I provided is helpful.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Vincent Xu
Microsoft Online Partner Support
======================================================Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others
may learn and benefit from this issue.
======================================================This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
======================================================>>From: <io.com@.newsgroup.nospam>
>>References: <exuolHWxGHA.3964@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>
<pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
>>Subject: Re: About ms06-040 memory bug
>>Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:09:13 +0200
>>Lines: 12
>>X-Priority: 3
>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
>>X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
>>Message-ID: <OglHDJcxGHA.1224@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>
>>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>>NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.241.4.149
>>Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl
>>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.server:442675
>>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>>"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" <v-xuwen@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>news:pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
>> Hi,
>> It is a Windows Server bug, regardless which application you launched on
>> the Server.
>>So is affecting also SQL Server with my configuration ?
>>Bye !
>>|||Thanks!
"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" <v-xuwen@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FoE0V8nxGHA.3392@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> Glad to hear the information I provided is helpful.
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Vincent Xu
> Microsoft Online Partner Support
> ======================================================> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> ======================================================> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others
> may learn and benefit from this issue.
> ======================================================> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
> ======================================================>
> --
>>From: <io.com@.newsgroup.nospam>
>>References: <exuolHWxGHA.3964@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>
> <pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
>>Subject: Re: About ms06-040 memory bug
>>Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:09:13 +0200
>>Lines: 12
>>X-Priority: 3
>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
>>X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
>>Message-ID: <OglHDJcxGHA.1224@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>
>>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>>NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.241.4.149
>>Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl
>>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.server:442675
>>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
>>"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" <v-xuwen@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>news:pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
>> Hi,
>> It is a Windows Server bug, regardless which application you launched
>> on
>> the Server.
>>So is affecting also SQL Server with my configuration ?
>>Bye !
>>
>|||Vincent,
Has anyone found a solution for this bug. We have been trying partner
support channels but keep getting tranferred to different groups over the
last two weeks and we still have customers that are having the problem. even
with the hotfix applied.
I would appreciate any help you could provide.
"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" wrote:
> Hi,
> Glad to hear the information I provided is helpful.
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Vincent Xu
> Microsoft Online Partner Support
> ======================================================> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> ======================================================> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others
> may learn and benefit from this issue.
> ======================================================> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,and confers no rights.
> ======================================================>
> --
> >>From: <io.com@.newsgroup.nospam>
> >>References: <exuolHWxGHA.3964@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>
> <pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
> >>Subject: Re: About ms06-040 memory bug
> >>Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:09:13 +0200
> >>Lines: 12
> >>X-Priority: 3
> >>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
> >>X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
> >>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
> >>Message-ID: <OglHDJcxGHA.1224@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>
> >>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
> >>NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.241.4.149
> >>Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl
> >>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.server:442675
> >>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
> >>
> >>"Vincent Xu [MSFT]" <v-xuwen@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >>news:pHl$wtZxGHA.1592@.TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> It is a Windows Server bug, regardless which application you launched on
> >> the Server.
> >>
> >>So is affecting also SQL Server with my configuration ?
> >>
> >>Bye !
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)