About those sp_ sprocs.

I find the replication put many sprocs with sp_ prefix in our database. Do
you think that should be changed? I have been told not to use sp_. See
http://www.sqlmag.com/Article/ArticleID/23011/sql_server_23011.html.
Have never really thought about it, but I suppose the reasoning is that it's
a good way of differentiating these stored procs as system ones. If you are
concerned about the performance issues, then you could raise a connect
case...
Cheers,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com